Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Which of the Following Is Not One of the Barriers Facing Many Immigrant Families?

Which of the Following Is Not One of the Barriers Facing Many Immigrant Families?

Post a Comment

The immigrant paradox in the Usa is an ascertainment that contempo immigrants oftentimes outperform more than established immigrants and non-immigrants on a number of health-, education-, and deport- or crime-related outcomes, despite the numerous barriers they face up to successful social integration.[1]

Map of the world with countries coloured co-ordinate to their immigrant population as a pct of the whole population, based on the United nations'south Earth Population Policies 2005 information. Overstate graphic to view fable.

According to the United nations, the number of first-generation immigrants worldwide is 244 meg.[ii] These large-scale population changes worldwide accept led many scholars, across fields, to study the acculturation and adjustment of immigrants to their new homes. Specifically, researchers have examined immigrant experiences equally they pertain to educational attainment, mental and concrete wellness, and bear/crime.

Researchers take tried to understand why later generations seem to perform less well than their forebears. They have institute that it can exist explained by non-optimal methodology and differences in the fashion generations are modified by the host civilisation.

Challenges facing immigrants [edit]

Immigrants face many challenges as a result of migration, stemming from the fact that the nations and communities they settle in are culturally unfamiliar. As a result, they detect themselves in an unwelcoming environs lacking in the infrastructure necessary to ensure a unproblematic transition. Additionally, because general attitudes of the host social club are ofttimes hostile and xenophobic,[three] [4] [5] immigrants are doubly vulnerable. Bigotry and prejudice are common and dictate daily experiences with individuals and organizations inside the host society. For example, although cultural sensitivity grooming is increasingly a required component of medical education, immigrants have historically faced and proceed to confront discrimination in the health intendance system.[6] An added barrier to equitable admission to health care comes as a result of many immigrants' limited English language proficiency.[seven] Many wellness care facilities accept inadequate interpretation services, and culturally sensitive health care providers are as well scarce. In improver, many immigrants are uninsured,[8] making the financial burdens of acceptable wellness care insurmountable.

Many immigrants also settle in de facto segregated, low-income neighborhoods and ethnic enclaves, especially during periods of loftier immigration.[nine] Although the benefits of living in such communities include increased social support, positive in-group relations, and the virtual emptying of cultural and linguistic communication barriers in daily interaction, often such neighborhoods are targets of institutional violence, such as stop and frisk.[ten] Further, due to public education funding policies in the United States, funds are often allocated to schools based on neighborhood property taxes. As a result, many immigrant children attend schools that are understaffed, underfunded, and lacking in resources in comparison to the schools of their more affluent peers.[11] [12] This is known equally the opportunity gap, past which low-income and marginalized groups have disproportionately low access to the opportunities and conveniences afforded to societally privileged groups, resulting in group-broad disparities in academic accomplishment, wages, and political power. In direct relation to these obstacles, immigrants likewise face challenges in the workplace, including poor and unsafe working weather,[13] unemployment, and the employment of highly skilled individuals in low-skill jobs.[fourteen]

To compound all of these issues, the brunt of acculturation is an added stressor. Navigating the divide between the heritage civilisation and the civilisation of the new society is difficult, as the traditions, behavior, and norms of these two cultures are often in direct conflict. This challenge is only compounded by the other obstacles immigrants are faced with, and has deleterious consequences for mental health,[fifteen] particularly because many migrants and refugees are already susceptible to elevated levels of psychopathology, due to the trauma associated with interpersonal conflict, acculturative stress and/or political unrest in their countries of origin.[xvi] [17] [18]

In light of these obstacles, information technology is expected that recent immigrants would have outcomes inferior to those of their native-built-in or non-immigrant peers.

Paradoxical findings [edit]

Despite the numerous challenges facing early generation immigrants, inquiry on the mental and physical health, educational, and conduct-related outcomes of these populations has demonstrated a paradoxical pattern.

Mental wellness outcomes [edit]

Inquiry with Filipino Americans has demonstrated that first-generation immigrants had lower levels of depressive symptoms than subsequent, The states-born generations.[19] Beginning-generation Mexican immigrants to the U.s.a. were found to take lower incidences of mood disorders and substance apply than their bicultural or subsequent generation counterparts.[20] [21] Similarly, immigrant youth in general are less likely to engage in risky behaviours and substance utilise, including booze and marijuana consumption.[22] Other research with Latino populations shows that immigrants are less probable to suffer from whatsoever mental disorder than not-Latino whites.[23] Research with Asian populations has supported this apparent paradox, with get-go-generation Asian Americans reporting lower levels of lifetime symptoms of depression and anxiety than US-born Asian Americans.[24] [25] One study inclusive of immigrants to the United states from Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Europe found that immigrants, regardless of place of origin, exhibited less vehement and nonviolent antisocial behaviour than US-born individuals.

These findings accept been replicated outside of the United States, with Canadian researchers finding that foreign born youth are less likely to display emotional and behavioural problems than their native-born peers, despite experiencing similar levels of poverty.[26] Research conducted in kingdom of the netherlands has also found evidence of an immigrant paradox, with showtime- and 2nd-generation Muslim immigrants reporting fewer psychological bug and higher self-esteem than Dutch nationals.

Physical health outcomes [edit]

The immigrant paradox as well extends to physical wellness, with recent immigrants having better outcomes than US-born individuals. One report of several thousand wellness records in Southern California constitute Asian and Latina women had better perinatal outcomes than both white and Black women.[27] Specifically, Asian and Latina women had lower infant mortality, higher birth weight, fewer Caesarean sections, fewer medical diagnoses during commitment, and shorter hospitalizations. This finding has besides been replicated in Espana, with immigrant mothers, barring those of Sub-Saharan African origin, having a lower frequency of low nascency weight than native Spanish mothers.[28]

With respect to overweight and obesity, it has been found that first-generation Mexican American women had healthier diets than both non-Latino whites and second-generation Mexican American women.[29] Further, second-generation women had the poorest dietary intake, consuming even smaller amounts of necessary nutrients than non-Latina white women. U.s.-born immigrants (i.e., 2nd-generation immigrants, and subsequent generations) have likewise been establish to engage in more than overweight-related behaviours, such as poor diet, smoking, and little concrete activity, in comparison to foreign-born immigrants.[30] For Cubans and Puerto Ricans, increased length of stay in the U.s. was likewise associated with increased presence of overweight. These findings were replicated in a later written report, which showed that with increased length of stay in the United States, immigrant health levels decreased significantly, approaching the levels of The states-built-in individuals.[31] Although immigrant men and women entered the Usa with lower BMIs than their US-born counterparts, within 10 to 15 years of arrival, there was no significant departure between the BMIs of immigrants versus US-borns. These findings employ to Asian American immigrants likewise, with second- and third-generation Asian American adolescents being 100% more probable to be obese relative to their commencement-generation peers.[32]

Educational outcomes [edit]

Amid Latino populations, kickoff- and second-generation Latino adolescents report high levels of endeavour in schoolhouse, with endeavour declining across generations.[33] They also place a greater value upon pedagogy, with the same downhill trend being observed. Kickoff-generation Mexican American adolescents, specifically, have more than positive attitudes towards academics and skip schoolhouse less than subsequent generations and non-Latino US-built-in Whites.[34] They are besides more involved in loftier schoolhouse Stalk coursework and have higher GPAs. With respect to Asian Americans, first-generation Asian American youth have more positive attitudes towards academics and skip schoolhouse less than subsequent generations and non-Latino U.s.-born whites. Farther, commencement- and 2d-generation Asian American youth report college levels of endeavour in schoolhouse. Other differences in educational outcomes include superior reading achievement for showtime- and second-generation immigrant children, in comparison to their third-generation counterparts.[35] First-generation Latino, Asian, and African youth accept greater overall educational attainment and are less likely to drib out of high school than subsequent generations of each community.[36] There are as well differences in susceptibility to stereotype threat across generations, with 2nd-generation Afro-Caribbean youth more at take a chance than first-generation youth.[37]

[edit]

At that place is also prove that the immigrant paradox extends to differential outcomes in conduct and/or crime. For example, rates of intimate partner violence are lower amidst non-Latino first-generation immigrant families.[38] [39] Immigrants are likewise less probable than non-immigrants to appoint in many kinds of lifetime criminal and fierce antisocial activity,[40] including drunkard driving, speeding, purposeful physical violence, and weapon utilise, with beginning-generation immigrants the least likely to appoint in criminal behavior, followed by second-generation immigrants, then 3rd-generation.[41] These furnishings tin be seen at the neighborhood level, with increases in first-generation immigrants resulting in decreases in neighborhood-wide violence over time.[38] [42] [43] [44] Further, amongst undocumented immigrants, drug-related crime is even less likely than it is among non-immigrants.[45]

With respect to criminality amid adolescents, first-, 1-and-a-one-half-, and second-generation Asian American, African American, and Caribbean American adolescents are all less likely to engage in illegal or runaway behavior than non-Latino The states-born White adolescents.[46] Immigrant neighborhood concentration was besides negatively correlated with recidivism for Latino youth.[47]

A special instance: the immigrant paradox in refugees? [edit]

In that location is a general consensus that refugees are at a item disadvantage when it comes to successful resettlement in the host gild, as the same challenges voluntary immigrants face are more often than not aggravated for refugees. However, some research has establish evidence of a paradox, with refugees at least three times less likely to engage in substance use than not-immigrants.[48] Other enquiry has plant refugees to Kingdom of denmark to have a lower likelihood of stroke and chest cancer compared to Danish natives, but college likelihood of lung cancer, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis.[49] Notably, levels of all of these diseases among refugee populations eventually converged to the same levels every bit Danish natives with increased length of residency.

At that place may too be an immigrant paradox for the perinatal outcomes of refugees, with the majority of refugee women studied having a lower rough birth rate, infant mortality charge per unit, maternal mortality charge per unit, and per centum of low birth weight than women in both their host country and their country of origin.[l]

Conflicting bear witness [edit]

There is some doubt among scholars as to whether or not the phenomenon really exists, with some findings alien with the body of research on immigrant outcomes. For instance, among Asian Americans, limited English proficiency was consistently associated with worse physical and mental health outcomes.[25] In improver to language proficiency, age at time of immigration is too an important factor, with older first-generation Mexican American youth more likely to drop out of school than their The states-born and younger, first-generation counterparts.[51] In further back up of this conclusion, data from the CPS shows that immigrating as a teenager is associated with completing less schooling than immigrating earlier or subsequently adolescence.[52] CPS data also shows that second-generation immigrants completed more schooling than both foreign-born immigrants and non-immigrant United states of america-built-in individuals.

In international enquiry on the phenomenon, Europe's SHARE data demonstrated no testify of a paradox, with immigrants having poorer health outcomes than native Europeans.[53] A study in Canada found that contempo and not-European immigrant women were more predisposed to developing postpartum depression than non-immigrant Canadians.[54]

Explanations [edit]

Acculturation and the erosion of protective factors [edit]

The virtually common hypothesis for the immigrant paradox considers contempo and first-generation immigrants' comparative access to cultural and social protective factors. Despite existence confronted with the many challenges arising from immigration and acculturation, first-generation immigrants accept greater social and cultural capital letter than subsequent generations. These include stronger social networks and highly adaptive cultural practices concerning religion, diet, substance use, and parenting style.[55] [56] Researchers likewise posit that first-generation immigrants are more than probable to place high importance upon bookish success due to fear of limited employment opportunities in the host society.[57] These protective factors result in superior lifetime health, educational, financial, and conduct-related outcomes.[57] Additionally, by having access to multiple cultural frameworks, contempo immigrants are able to code-switch between frameworks or engage in downward social comparison as methods of self-protection.[58]

In comparison, subsequent generations may not have access to such social and cultural majuscule, having been socialized into the norms and expectations of the host society (i.due east., consuming more than candy and unhealthy foods, having a smaller network of aforementioned-ethnicity peers, increased substance use). Further, intergenerational conflict is more probable betwixt first-generation immigrants and their 2nd-generation children due to differing cultural practices, with parents being accepted to the norms of their civilization of origin and children having been socialized into the norms of the host lodge.[56] This type of disharmonize has been linked to poorer outcomes for children.

A third cost of acculturation is linked to immigrant children'southward cultural socialization. A strong sense of ethnic identity and pride in ane's cultural heritage is generally understood to be protective from negative mental wellness outcomes.[xix] Yet, with increased length of stay in the host club, subsequent generations are likely to report decreasing levels of involvement in culturally important traditions and practices. With this comes decreasing force of ethnic identity. 2d-generation immigrants are also less probable to endorse meritocratic views, which is similarly correlated with decreasing force of ethnic identity.[59] These attributes are all associated with poorer mental health.[19] [60]

Possible benefits of ethnic enclaves [edit]

See: Barrio advantage

First-generation immigrants often settle in ethnic enclaves, which carry a host of advantages. Residents of these neighborhoods take access to a potent and supportive network of same-ethnicity peers and potential admission to culturally sensitive healthcare providers that may allow for increased fiscal gain and improve physical and mental wellness outcomes.[61] [62] [63] Indigenous enclaves besides eliminate the challenges associated with language barriers, with residents often sharing linguistic similarity.[64]

Healthy immigrant choice [edit]

Another common explanation for the immigrant paradox is that the vast majority of superior outcomes among early generations of immigrants can be accounted for by a selection consequence. Proponents of this hypothesis argue that merely the most psychologically and physically healthy individuals migrate from their land of origin, and therefore take superior outcomes to brainstorm with.[55]

Methodological concerns [edit]

Much of the literature on the immigrant paradox in mental health relies on self-report data. This may be problematic in that certain populations may differentially interpret questions in ways that are meaningful and event in significant disparities between groups.[24] Similarly, many measures view mental health solely through a Western lens, accounting only for the types of symptoms normally expressed in Western societies.[25] This may result in the underreporting of poor mental health amongst non-Western populations.

Some other issue in research on immigrants is the grouping of highly diverse ethnic groups together in monolithic racial categories,[58] namely the pan-ethnic "Asian" and "Latino" categories. Much of the inquiry on Latinos and the immigrant paradox has been conducted with Mexican American populations, ignoring the fact that in that location are 32 other countries that fall under the Latin American label. Similarly, much research on Asian Americans has been conducted with East Asian populations, ignoring the differential treatment and experiences of South and Southeast Asians, and the different refugee status of individuals across Asia (examples include Lhotshampa refugees, who are of South Asian heritage, and Cambodian refugees, who are of Southeast Asian heritage). Such groupings are problematic in that they erase the large diversity in socioeconomic status, educational background, and historical trauma of each of these ethnic groups – factors which all contribute to the consequent positive or negative outcomes of immigrants.

Time to come directions in immigrant research [edit]

Carola Suárez-Orozco, Ph.D. calls for increased inquiry on the psychology of immigrants paying attention to differences in refugee condition, documentation condition, gender, and indigenous group (in lieu of using pan-ethnic groupings).[58] Enquiry must likewise consider seasonal migrants, the differential racialization of indigenous groups, and the role of English proficiency on educational and health outcomes.

Run across besides [edit]

  • Acculturation
  • Americanization (immigration)
  • Health equity
  • Hispanic paradox
  • Mental health inequality
  • Minority stress
  • Model minority

References [edit]

  1. ^
    • Vaughn, Michael K.; Salas-Wright, Christopher P.; Maynard, Brandy R.; Qian, Zhengmin; Terzis, Lauren; Kusow, Abdi M.; DeLisi, Matt (2014). "Criminal epidemiology and the immigrant paradox: Intergenerational aperture in violence and antisocial behavior among immigrants". Periodical of Criminal Justice. 42 (6): 483–490. doi:ten.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.09.004.
    • Salas-Wright, Christopher P; Vaughn, Michael M; Clark, Trenette T; Terzis, Lauren D; Córdova, David (2014-11-01). "Substance Apply Disorders Amidst Offset- and Second-Generation Immigrant Adults in the United States: Evidence of an Immigrant Paradox?". Journal of Studies on Booze and Drugs. 75 (6): 958–967. doi:10.15288/jsad.2014.75.958. ISSN 1937-1888. PMC4211337. PMID 25343653.
  2. ^ "United Nations Population Partitioning | Department of Economic and Social Diplomacy". www.un.org . Retrieved 2017-11-12 .
  3. ^ Schneider, S. L. (2008-02-01). "Anti-Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: Outgroup Size and Perceived Ethnic Threat". European Sociological Review. 24 (ane): 53–67. doi:10.1093/esr/jcm034. ISSN 0266-7215.
  4. ^ Huber, Lindsay Perez; Lopez, Corina Benavides; Malagon, Maria C.; Velez, Veronica; Solorzano, Daniel Yard. (2008-03-01). "Getting beyond the 'symptom,' acknowledging the 'disease': theorizing racist nativism". Contemporary Justice Review. xi (1): 39–51. doi:10.1080/10282580701850397. ISSN 1028-2580.
  5. ^ Immature, Julia Grand. (2017-03-28). "Making America 1920 Again? Nativism and Usa Clearing, By and Present". Periodical on Migration and Human Security. five (1): 217–235. doi:10.14240/jmhs.v5i1.81. ISSN 2330-2488.
  6. ^ Lauderdale, Diane S.; Wen, Ming; Jacobs, Elizabeth A.; Kandula, Namratha R. (2006). "Immigrant Perceptions of Discrimination in Wellness Care". Medical Care. 44 (10): 914–920. doi:x.1097/01.mlr.0000220829.87073.f7. PMID 17001262.
  7. ^ Woloshin, Steven (1995-03-01). "Linguistic communication Barriers in Medicine in the United States". JAMA: The Periodical of the American Medical Association. 273 (9): 724. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520330054037. ISSN 0098-7484.
  8. ^ Carrasquillo, O; Carrasquillo, A I; Shea, S (June 2000). "Wellness insurance coverage of immigrants living in the United states: differences by citizenship condition and country of origin". American Journal of Public Health. ninety (6): 917–923. doi:10.2105/ajph.90.6.917. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC1446276. PMID 10846509.
  9. ^ Iceland, John; Scopilliti, Melissa (2008-02-01). "Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1990–2000". Demography. 45 (1): 79–94. doi:10.1353/dem.2008.0009. ISSN 0070-3370. PMC2831378. PMID 18390292.
  10. ^ Gelman, Andrew; Fagan, Jeffrey; Kiss, Alex (2007-09-01). "An Analysis of the New York City Police Department'due south "Cease-and-Frisk" Policy in the Context of Claims of Racial Bias". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 102 (479): 813–823. CiteSeerXten.1.1.300.2930. doi:10.1198/016214506000001040. ISSN 0162-1459.
  11. ^ Brownstein, Janie Boschma and Ronald. "Students of Color Are Much More than Likely to Attend Schools Where Most of Their Peers Are Poor". The Atlantic . Retrieved 2017-eleven-15 .
  12. ^ Semuels, Alana. "Proficient School, Rich School; Bad Schoolhouse, Poor School". The Atlantic . Retrieved 2017-11-fifteen .
  13. ^ ORRENIUS, PIA One thousand.; ZAVODNY, MADELINE (August 2009). "Practise Immigrants Work In Riskier Jobs?". Demography. 46 (3): 535–551. doi:x.1353/dem.0.0064. ISSN 0070-3370. PMC2831347. PMID 19771943.
  14. ^ Dean, Jennifer Asanin; Wilson, Kathi (2009-04-01). "'Instruction? It is irrelevant to my job now. It makes me very depressed …': exploring the health impacts of under/unemployment among highly skilled contempo immigrants in Canada". Ethnicity & Health. 14 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1080/13557850802227049. ISSN 1355-7858. PMID 18949654.
  15. ^ Sirin, Selcuk R.; Ryce, Patrice; Gupta, Taveeshi; Rogers-Sirin, Lauren (2013). "The function of acculturative stress on mental wellness symptoms for immigrant adolescents: A longitudinal investigation". Developmental Psychology. 49 (four): 736–748. doi:10.1037/a0028398. PMID 22563676.
  16. ^ Mobasher, Mohsen (2016-07-27). "Cultural Trauma and Ethnic Identity Formation Amidst Iranian Immigrants in the United States". American Behavioral Scientist. 50 (1): 100–117. doi:x.1177/0002764206289656.
  17. ^ Kaltman, Stacey; Light-green, Bonnie Fifty.; Mete, Mihriye; Shara, Nawar; Miranda, Jeanne (2010). "Trauma, depression, and comorbid PTSD/depression in a community sample of Latina immigrants". Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2 (1): 31–39. doi:ten.1037/a0018952. PMC2850073. PMID 20376305.
  18. ^ Steel, Zachary; Silove, Derrick; Bird, Kevin; McGorry, Patrick; Mohan, P. (1999-07-01). "Pathways from War Trauma to Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Amid Tamil Aviary Seekers, Refugees, and Immigrants". Journal of Traumatic Stress. 12 (iii): 421–435. doi:x.1023/A:1024710902534. ISSN 0894-9867. PMID 10467553.
  19. ^ a b c Mossakowski, Krysia Northward. (2003). "Coping with Perceived Discrimination: Does Indigenous Identity Protect Mental Wellness?". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 44 (3): 318–331. doi:10.2307/1519782. JSTOR 1519782. PMID 14582311.
  20. ^ Burnam, Yard. Audrey; Hough, Richard L.; Karno, Marvin; Escobar, Javier I.; Telles, Cynthia A. (1987). "Acculturation and Lifetime Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders Among Mexican Americans in Los Angeles". Journal of Health and Social Beliefs. 28 (1): 89–102. doi:10.2307/2137143. JSTOR 2137143.
  21. ^ Bacio, Guadalupe A.; Mays, Vickie K.; Lau, Anna South. (2012). "Drinking initiation and problematic drinking among Latino adolescents: Explanations of the immigrant paradox". Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 27 (1): 14–22. doi:x.1037/a0029996. PMC3627496. PMID 23025707.
  22. ^ Blake, S M; Ledsky, R; Goodenow, C; O'Donnell, 50 (May 2001). "Recency of immigration, substance utilize, and sexual behavior amid Massachusetts adolescents". American Journal of Public Health. 91 (5): 794–798. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.v.794. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC1446677. PMID 11344890.
  23. ^ Ortega, A. N.; Rosenheck, R.; Alegría, M.; Desai, R. A. (Nov 2000). "Acculturation and the lifetime risk of psychiatric and substance employ disorders among Hispanics". The Journal of Nervous and Mental Illness. 188 (eleven): 728–735. doi:10.1097/00005053-200011000-00002. ISSN 0022-3018. PMID 11093374.
  24. ^ a b Lau, Anna Southward.; Tsai, William; Shih, Josephine; Liu, Lisa L.; Hwang, Wei-Chin; Takeuchi, David T. (2013). "The immigrant paradox among Asian American women: Are disparities in the burden of depression and anxiety paradoxical or explicable?". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 81 (five): 901–911. doi:10.1037/a0032105. PMC3835700. PMID 23477477.
  25. ^ a b c John, Dolly A.; Castro, A.B. de; Martin, Diane P.; Duran, Bonnie; Takeuchi, David T. (2012). "Does an immigrant health paradox exist among Asian Americans? Associations of nativity and occupational form with self-rated wellness and mental disorders". Social Science & Medicine. 75 (12): 2085–2098. doi:x.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.035. PMC5600623. PMID 22503561.
  26. ^ Beiser, Morton; Hou, Feng; Hyman, Ilene; Tousignant, Michel (2002-02-01). "Poverty, Family unit Process, and the Mental Health of Immigrant Children in Canada". American Journal of Public Health. 92 (ii): 220–227. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.ii.220. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC1447046. PMID 11818295.
  27. ^ Voelker, Rebecca (1994-12-21). "Born in the United states of america: Infant Health Paradox". JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 272 (23): 1803. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520230015006. ISSN 0098-7484.
  28. ^ Speciale, Anna Maria; Regidor, Enrique (2011-06-01). "Understanding the Universality of the Immigrant Wellness Paradox: The Spanish Perspective". Periodical of Immigrant and Minority Health. 13 (3): 518–525. doi:10.1007/s10903-010-9365-i. ISSN 1557-1912. PMID 20614183.
  29. ^ Guendelman, S; Abrams, B (1995-01-01). "Dietary intake amidst Mexican-American women: generational differences and a comparison with white non-Hispanic women". American Journal of Public Health. 85 (1): 20–25. doi:10.2105/ajph.85.1.xx. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC1615282. PMID 7832256.
  30. ^ Gordon-Larsen, Penny; Harris, Kathleen Mullan; Ward, Dianne Due south; Popkin, Barry K (2003). "Acculturation and overweight-related behaviors among Hispanic immigrants to the US: the National Longitudinal Report of Adolescent Health". Social Science & Medicine. 57 (11): 2023–2034. CiteSeerX10.one.1.468.7914. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00072-eight. PMID 14512234.
  31. ^ Antecol, Heather; Bedard, Kelly (2006). "Unhealthy Assimilation: Why Do Immigrants Converge to American Health Status Levels?". Census. 43 (2): 337–360. doi:ten.1353/dem.2006.0011. hdl:10419/33251. JSTOR 4137201. PMID 16889132.
  32. ^ Popkin, Barry M.; Udry, J. Richard (1998-04-01). "Adolescent Obesity Increases Significantly in Second and Third Generation U.S. Immigrants: The National Longitudinal Written report of Boyish Wellness". The Periodical of Nutrition. 128 (4): 701–706. doi:10.1093/jn/128.4.701. ISSN 0022-3166. PMID 9521631.
  33. ^ Aretakis, Maria T.; Ceballo, Rosario; Suarez, Gloria A.; Camacho, Tissyana C. (2015). "Investigating the immigrant paradox and Latino adolescents' academic attitudes". Journal of Latina/o Psychology. three (ane): 56–69. doi:10.1037/lat0000031.
  34. ^ Greenman, Emily (2013). "Educational attitudes, school peer context, and the "immigrant paradox" in education". Social Scientific discipline Enquiry. 42 (three): 698–714. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.014. PMC3616373. PMID 23521989.
  35. ^ Palacios, Natalia; Guttmannova, Katarina; Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay (2008). "Early on reading achievement of children in immigrant families: Is there an immigrant paradox?". Developmental Psychology. 44 (5): 1381–1395. doi:10.1037/a0012863. PMID 18793070.
  36. ^ Perreira, Krista Thousand.; Harris, Kathleen Mullan; Lee, Dohoon (2006-08-01). "Making it in America: High school completion by immigrant and native youth". Demography. 43 (3): 511–536. doi:10.1353/dem.2006.0026. ISSN 0070-3370. PMID 17051825.
  37. ^ Kay., Deaux (2006). To be an immigrant. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. ISBN9780871540850. OCLC 794701253.
  38. ^ a b Wright, Emily M.; Benson, Michael 50. (2010-08-01). "Immigration and Intimate Partner Violence: Exploring the Immigrant Paradox". Social Problems. 57 (3): 480–503. doi:10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.480. ISSN 0037-7791.
  39. ^ Vaughn, Michael G.; Salas-Wright, Christopher P.; Cooper-Sadlo, Shannon; Maynard, Brandy R.; Larson, Matthew (2015-07-01). "Are Immigrants More Likely Than Native-Born Americans to Perpetrate Intimate Partner Violence?". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. thirty (eleven): 1888–1904. doi:10.1177/0886260514549053. ISSN 0886-2605. PMID 25217226.
  40. ^ Bersani, Bianca Due east. (2014-03-04). "An Test of First and Second Generation Immigrant Offending Trajectories". Justice Quarterly. 31 (2): 315–343. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.659200. ISSN 0741-8825.
  41. ^ Vaughn, Michael G.; Salas-Wright, Christopher P.; Maynard, Brandy R.; Qian, Zhengmin; Terzis, Lauren; Kusow, Abdi One thousand.; DeLisi, Matt (2014-11-01). "Criminal epidemiology and the immigrant paradox: Intergenerational discontinuity in violence and antisocial behavior among immigrants". Journal of Criminal Justice. 42 (six): 483–490. doi:ten.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.09.004.
  42. ^ Martinez, Ramiro; Stowell, Jacob I.; Lee, Matthew T. (2010-08-01). "Clearing and Criminal offense in an Era of Transformation: A Longitudinal Analysis of Homicides in San Diego Neighborhoods, 1980–2000*". Criminology. 48 (3): 797–829. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00202.x. ISSN 1745-9125.
  43. ^ Ousey, Graham C.; Kubrin, Charis E. (2009). "Exploring the Connexion betwixt Immigration and Tearing Crime Rates in U.S. Cities, 1980–2000". Social Problems. 56 (three): 447–473. doi:ten.1525/sp.2009.56.three.447. JSTOR x.1525/sp.2009.56.iii.447.
  44. ^ Desmond, Scott A.; Kubrin, Charis Due east. (2009-09-01). "The Power of Place: Immigrant Communities and Adolescent Violence". The Sociological Quarterly. 50 (4): 581–607. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01153.x. ISSN 0038-0253. [ permanent dead link ]
  45. ^ Hagan, John; Palloni, Alberto (1999). "Sociological Criminology and the Mythology of Hispanic Immigration and Crime". Social Issues. 46 (4): 617–632. doi:ten.2307/3097078. JSTOR 3097078.
  46. ^ Hagan, John; Levi, Ron; Dinovitzer, Ronit (2008-02-01). "The Symbolic Violence of the Criminal offense-Immigration Nexus: Migrant Mythologies in the Americas". Criminology & Public Policy. vii (1): 95–112. doi:ten.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00493.x. ISSN 1745-9133.
  47. ^ Wright, Kevin A.; Rodriguez, Nancy (2014-09-03). "A Closer Expect at the Paradox: Examining Immigration and Youth Reoffending in Arizona". Justice Quarterly. 31 (five): 882–904. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.700057. ISSN 0741-8825.
  48. ^ Salas-Wright, Christopher P.; Vaughn, Michael G. (2014). "A "refugee paradox" for substance use disorders?". Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 142: 345–349. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.008. PMC4127091. PMID 24999058.
  49. ^ Norredam, Marie; Agyemang, Charles; Hoejbjerg Hansen, Oluf K.; Petersen, Jørgen H.; Byberg, Stine; Krasnik, Allan; Kunst, Anton E. (2014-08-01). "Duration of residence and disease occurrence among refugees and family reunited immigrants: exam of the 'salubrious migrant effect' hypothesis". Tropical Medicine & International Wellness. 19 (8): 958–967. doi:10.1111/tmi.12340. ISSN 1365-3156. PMID 24889930.
  50. ^ Hynes, Michelle (2002-08-07). "Reproductive Health Indicators and Outcomes Among Refugee and Internally Displaced Persons in Postemergency Phase Camps". JAMA. 288 (five): 595–603. doi:x.1001/jama.288.5.595. ISSN 0098-7484. PMID 12150671.
  51. ^ Landale, Nancy South.; Oropesa, R.Due south.; Llanes, Daniel (1998). "Schooling, Work, and Idleness among Mexican and Not-Latino White Adolescents". Social Scientific discipline Inquiry. 27 (4): 457–480. doi:10.1006/ssre.1998.0631.
  52. ^ Chiswick, Barry R.; DebBurman, Noyna (2004-08-01). "Educational attainment: analysis by immigrant generation". Economics of Education Review. Special Issue In Honour of Lewis C. Solman. 23 (four): 361–379. CiteSeerX10.1.ane.195.3562. doi:ten.1016/j.econedurev.2003.09.002. hdl:10419/20450.
  53. ^ Solé-Auró, Aïda; Crimmins, Eileen G. (2008-12-01). "Health of Immigrants in European Countries1". International Migration Review. 42 (4): 861–876. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00150.ten. ISSN 1747-7379. PMC2967040. PMID 21048888.
  54. ^ Urquia, Marcelo Fifty.; O'Campo, Patricia J.; Heaman, Maureen I. (2012-05-01). "Revisiting the immigrant paradox in reproductive health: The roles of duration of residence and ethnicity". Social Science & Medicine. 74 (10): 1610–1621. doi:x.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.013. PMID 22464222.
  55. ^ a b Acevedo-Garcia, Dolores; Bates, Lisa M. (2008). Latinas/bone in the Usa: Irresolute the Confront of América. Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 101–113. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71943-6_7. ISBN9780387719412.
  56. ^ a b Harker, Kathryn (2000–2001). "Immigrant Generation, Assimilation, and Adolescent Psychological Well-Existence". Social Forces. 79 (3): 969–1004. doi:ten.1353/sof.2001.0010.
  57. ^ a b Harris, Angel L.; Jamison, Kenneth M.; Trujillo, Monica H. (2008). "Disparities in the Educational Success of Immigrants: An Assessment of the Immigrant Event for Asians and Latinos". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 620 (1): xc–114. doi:ten.1177/0002716208322765.
  58. ^ a b c Suárez-Orozco, Carola; Carhill, Avary (2008-09-01). "Afterword: New directions in enquiry with immigrant families and their children". New Directions for Child and Boyish Evolution. 2008 (121): 87–104. doi:ten.1002/cd.224. ISSN 1534-8687. PMID 18792953.
  59. ^ Wiley, Shaun; Deaux, Kay; Hagelskamp, Carolin (2012). "Born in the USA: How immigrant generation shapes meritocracy and its relation to ethnic identity and commonage activity". Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. xviii (ii): 171–180. doi:10.1037/a0027661. PMID 22506820.
  60. ^ Duffey, Thelma; Somody, Catherine (2011-07-05). "The Role of Relational-Cultural Theory in Mental Health Counseling". Journal of Mental Wellness Counseling. 33 (iii): 223–242. doi:10.17744/mehc.33.three.c10410226u275647.
  61. ^ Mazumdar, Sanjoy; Mazumdar, Shampa; Docuyanan, Faye; McLaughlin, Colette Marie (2000). "Creating a sense of place: the Vietnamese-Americans and Piffling Saigon" (PDF). Journal of Environmental Psychology. xx (4): 319–333. doi:10.1006/jevp.2000.0170.
  62. ^ Yang, Joshua S.; Kagawa-Singer, Marjorie (2007-07-30). "Increasing Access to Intendance for Cultural and Linguistic Minorities: Ethnicity-Specific Health Care Organizations and Infrastructure". Journal of Health Treat the Poor and Underserved. 18 (3): 532–549. doi:10.1353/hpu.2007.0073. ISSN 1548-6869. PMID 17675712.
  63. ^ Barry R., Chiswick; Miller, Paul Westward. (2005-03-01). "Do Enclaves Matter in Immigrant Adjustment?". City & Customs. four (1): 5–35. doi:x.1111/j.1535-6841.2005.00101.ten. hdl:10419/21507. ISSN 1540-6040.
  64. ^ Bauer, Thomas; Epstein, Gil Southward.; Gang, Ira Due north. (2005-11-01). "Enclaves, language, and the location pick of migrants" (PDF). Journal of Population Economics. xviii (four): 649–662. doi:ten.1007/s00148-005-0009-z. hdl:10419/21370. ISSN 0933-1433.

Farther reading [edit]

  • Acculturation: Advances in Theory, Measurement, and Applied Research. American Psychological Association. 2003. ISBN 9781557989208.
  • Children of Immigration. Harvard University Press. 2002. ISBN 9780674008380.
  • The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is condign American a developmental risk?. American Psychological Association. 2012. ISBN978-1433810534.
  • La Nueva California: Latinos from Pioneers to Mail service-Millennials. Academy of California Press. 2017. ISBN 9780520292536.
  • Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. University of California Press. 2001. ISBN 9780520228481.
  • Immigrant Stories: Ethnicity and Academics in Middle Babyhood. Oxford University Press. 2009. ISBN 9780195174595.
  • Immigration and Crime: Race, Ethnicity, and Violence. NYU Press. 2006. ISBN 9780814757055.

acevedohishisent.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigrant_paradox_in_the_United_States

You may like these posts

Post a Comment for "Which of the Following Is Not One of the Barriers Facing Many Immigrant Families?"